APHC010404352012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20752/2012 Between: 1.KUNA SUDHEER, S/O NARSHINGA RAO AGED 26 YEARS, EX FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O TUNGAPETA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR NREGS, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2.PROJECT DIRECTOR DWMA APDC NREGS, ANDHRA PRADESH, SRIKAKULAM 3.MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/ PROGRAMME, OFFICER, NREGS MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD PONDURU, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order in proceedings No. 82/2007/A/EGS dt. 23.3.2010 issued by the 3rd respondent as well as the letter vide Rc. No. 4/2009/EGS/E4 dt. 1.2.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 and consequently set aside the same and reinstate the petitioner into service by suspending the said orders and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 26606 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits by suspending the operation of the orders the order in proceedings No. 82/2007/AJEGS dt. 23.3.2010 issued by the 3rd respondent as well as the letter vide Rc. No. 4/2009/EGS/E4 dt. 1.2.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M VISWANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.20752 OF 2012 ORDER: 1. No representation for the petitioner today also. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner was engaged as a Field Assistant on a contract basis for a temporary period and that the tenure of the said contract has also expired. Thereafter, the contracts were entered into with other parties. 3. Recording the submissions, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 11.03.2026 KGM 3 132 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.20752 of 2012 Dated 11.03.2026 KGM