Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23174 (AP)

BONGU JOGINAIDU v. THE STATE OF APNDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6009/2021 · 2026-02-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010410682021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6009/2021 Between: 1.BONGU JOGINAIDU, S/O RAMAMURTHY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC.. TEACHER, M.P.U.P. SCHOOL, GOTTIVALASA VILLAGE, GARUGUBILLI MANDAL, R/ O BACK SIDE OF SOUNDARYA THEATER, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF APNDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF A.P., AT AMARAVATHI. 2.KARAKAVALASA NAGESWARARAO, S/O LATE MADHAVARAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC.. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION, PARVATIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.A RAVI SHANKAR 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioner nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. In view of the continued absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 23.02.2026 VTS