CWP-12843-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 138 Panchanan International Private Limited District Level Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Ludhiana & another CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. for the petitioner. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J 1. The the Constitution of India is seeking 24.04.2025 passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Ludhiana. It petition No.1010 of 2025 pending before Ludhiana. 2. On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that remedy to file Conciliation Act may dismiss its petition submits that as per Rule 11 Facilitation Council Rules, 2021 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Panchanan International Private Limited Versus District Level Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Ludhiana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL r. Shubham Gupta, Mr. Shlok Dalal and for the petitioner. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Article the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of arbitral award dated passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, is further seeking setting aside of proceedings in execution petition No.1010 of 2025 pending before learned On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that remedy to file objection petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the 1996 Act’) may dismiss its petition, thus, the writ petition may be entertained. submits that as per Rule 11-A of the Punjab Micro and Sm Facilitation Council Rules, 2021 (for short ‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12843-2026 Date of Decision: 28.04.2026 …Petitioner District Level Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Ludhiana …Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Shlok Dalal and Ms. Kanak, Advocates, petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of setting aside of arbitral award dated passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, is further seeking setting aside of proceedings in execution learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Act’) is not efficacious and Court petition may be entertained. He further Punjab Micro and Small Enterprises (for short ‘the 2021 Rules’), any decree, Petitioner District Level Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Ludhiana s Kanak, Advocates, of setting aside of arbitral award dated passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, is further seeking setting aside of proceedings in execution Civil Judge (Junior Division), On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under Section 34 of the Arbitration & is not efficacious and Court He further all Enterprises any decree, VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12843-2026 award or other order made under Chapter V of the Act Collector of the District and the amount In the present case, respondent Court. In view of Rule 11 maintainable. 3. The apprehension of the petitioner that Court may not entertain its petition under Section petitioner has remedy to approach Court under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. In view of the availability of effective and efficacious remedy, there is no occasion to entertain the present petition. Section 34 of the 1996 Act may allow or reject petitioner’s petition on merits. 4. The petitioner is further claiming that in view of Rule 11 2021 Rules, execution petition is not maintainable before the Civil Court till date has not passed final order and the petitioner has right to raise question of jurisdiction before the said Court. adjudication, this Court finds no reason to interfere at this stage. 5. In the backdr petitioner to avail alternative remedy. 28.04.2026 Vimal Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2026 -2- award or other order made under Chapter V of the Act Collector of the District and the amount is recovered as arrears of land revenue. present case, respondent No.2 has filed execution petition before Civil Court. In view of Rule 11-A of the 2021 Rules, execution petition is not The apprehension of the petitioner that Court may not entertain its petition under Section 34 of the 1996 Act is mis remedy to approach Court under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. In view of the availability of effective and efficacious remedy, there is no occasion to entertain the present petition. It is another aspect that Section 34 of the 1996 Act may allow or reject petitioner’s petition on merits. The petitioner is further claiming that in view of Rule 11 2021 Rules, execution petition is not maintainable before the Civil till date has not passed final order and the petitioner has right to raise question of jurisdiction before the said Court. adjudication, this Court finds no reason to interfere at this stage. In the backdrop, the writ petition is d petitioner to avail alternative remedy. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No award or other order made under Chapter V of the Act is executed by the recovered as arrears of land revenue. has filed execution petition before Civil A of the 2021 Rules, execution petition is not The apprehension of the petitioner that Court may not entertain its Act is mis-conceived and premature. The remedy to approach Court under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. In view of the availability of effective and efficacious remedy, there is no is another aspect that Court under Section 34 of the 1996 Act may allow or reject petitioner’s petition on merits. The petitioner is further claiming that in view of Rule 11-A of the 2021 Rules, execution petition is not maintainable before the Civil Court. Civil till date has not passed final order and the petitioner has right to raise question of jurisdiction before the said Court. In the absence of final adjudication, this Court finds no reason to interfere at this stage. op, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No executed by the recovered as arrears of land revenue. has filed execution petition before Civil A of the 2021 Rules, execution petition is not The apprehension of the petitioner that Court may not entertain its and premature. The remedy to approach Court under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. In view of the availability of effective and efficacious remedy, there is no Court under A of the Court. Civil till date has not passed final order and the petitioner has right to raise In the absence of final isposed of with liberty to the (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.28 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document