Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23168 (AP)

ALUGUSANI HYMAVATHI v. DR SURESH KUMAR

CC/3700/2024 · 2026-01-07

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010408892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3700/2024 Between: 1. ALUGUSANI HYMAVATHI, D/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGE 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION- DOCTOR, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER, NAGIREDDY PALLI, VENIGANDLA MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR SURESH KUMAR, THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. DR PADMAVATHI, THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE GOLLAPUDI,VJAYAWADA , ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents for contempt of Court under Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, intentionally, deliberately not complying/implementing the orders dated 04-10-2024 passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 19296 OF 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to repost me in PHC Nageireddy Pally ONgole, Prakasam District without any jurisdiction, but also for not complying with and violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVAKUMAR SALIKITI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri Devakumar Salikiti, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sushma Yaganti, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the interim order dated 04.09.2024 in W.P.No.19296 of 2024. 3. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that interim order dated 04.09.2024 in W.P.No.19296 of 2024, has been complied with. 4. Recording the same, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 08.01.2026 SNI 3 212 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3700/2024 Date: 08.01.2026 SNI