Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23167 (AP)

Yelamanchili Appayamma v. Neerabha Kumar Prasad

CC/1858/2021 · 2026-02-22

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010409212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1858/2021 Between: 1. YELAMANCHILI APPAYAMMA, W/O. LAYE PYDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.2-9, PURUSHOTHAMAPURAM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. KORADA VENKATESH, S/O.AMMATHALLI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.1-50/3, PURUSHOTHAMAPURAM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. NEERABHA KUMAR PRASAD, I.A.S., PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR A MALLIKARJUNA, I.A.S., DISTRICT COLLECTER AND MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, HAVING OFFICE AT DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 3. M VENU GOPAL REDDY, I.A.S., JOINT COLLECTOR - CUM - SETTLEMENT OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. HAVING OFFICE AT DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. P RAMA RAO, S/O.JAGGU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, TAHSILDAR - PENDURTHI MANDAL, HAVING OFFICE AT OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. P POLA RAJU, S/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PRIMARY TRIBUNAL CUM SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (INAMS), VISAKHAPATNAM REVENUE DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors under sec. 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts Act for willfully and wantonly disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble court dated 30.06.2021 passed in WP.No.5932 of 2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY 2. S PRANATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P SUBASH The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 30.06.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.5932 of 2021. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 30.06.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.5932 of 2021 has been complied with as no further instructions were received from the petitioners. 3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file an application to revive the same, if the cause still subsists. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:23.02.2026 GK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:1858 of 2021 Dated:23.02.2026 GK