1 2026:CGHC:24904 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2954 of 2026 Ajay Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Lalit Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years Occupation- Fad Prabhari, Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Koyalibeda, Procurement Center Koyalibeda, Registration No. 368, R/o Village- Durga Chowk Koyalibeda- Thana And Tehsil- Koyalibeda, District- North Baster Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Kanker Distt.- North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 3 - District Co-Operative Markfed Officer Kanker Distt.- North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 4 - Deputy Commissioner/ Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society Kanker, Distt.- North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Branch Manager Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Jagdalpur, Branch Antagarh, Distt.- North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Koyalibeda Registration No. 368 Through Its Manager Cum Prescribed Officer, Lmps Koyalibeda, Thana And Tehsil- Koyalibeda Distt.- North Baster Kanker (C.G.). ... Respondents 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Petitioners : Sunil Sahu, Advocate For respondent-State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, PL. For respondent-Markfed : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate. For respondent-Bank : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice has been issued by the concerned Manager of the Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Koyalibeda to the petitioner, who was temporarily appointed as ‘in-charge’ of the society to purchase the paddy for about 04 months. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Markfed submits that the dispute which the petitioner is raising, can be raised under Section 64 of the Co-operative Societies Act. The Markfed has not initiated any action against the petitioner, as such, this petition is not maintainable. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that it is inter-se dispute between the petitioner and the concerned Manager of the Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Koyalibeda, hence, the petition is not maintainable. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to 3 file appropriate application/petition before the concerned Authority. 5. In view of above submissions, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge J.