Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23156 (PNJ)

GURDEV KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/2526/2026 · 2026-05-26

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2526-2026 DECIDED ON: 26.05.2026 GURDEV KAUR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jasdeep Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. Ms. Isha Goyal, Advocate, (through VC mode), and Mr. R.P. Saini, Advocate, for the complainant. SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.28, dated 22.02.2025, under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, registered at Police Station Navi Baradari, District Jalandhar. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is presently hospitalized due to a serious medical condition and is not even in a position to move out. 3. It is further submitted that a cheque amounting to Rs.20 lakhs had already been handed over to the Investigating Officer by the petitioner in the month of January, 2025; however, the said cheque was never presented for encashment. Nevertheless, petitioner is willing to LAVISHA 2026.05.26 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh CRM-M-2526-2026 -2- issue another cheque or demand draft as and when she is discharged from the hospital. 4. In view of the observations recorded in the order dated 22.05.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner reiterates the request for withdrawal of the present petition. 5. Accordingly, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 26.05.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.05.26 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh