- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29594 WP No. 9232 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9232 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SUBHASH CHAND MOHAN LAL AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF H. MOHAN LAL, RESIDING AT NO. 1033, 1ST MAIN ROAD, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, OPPOSITE TO PLANET HONDA SERVICE STATION, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 010. 2. MOHANLAL BHARATH KUMAR JAIN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SON OF HIRACHAND MOHAN LAL, RESIDING AT NO. 1033, 1ST MAIN ROAD, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, OPPOSITE TO PLANET HONDA SERVICE STATION, 4TH BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 010. 3. VIMAL KUMAR MOHANLAL AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS SON OF MOHAN LAL, RESIDING AT MO. 133. 2ND MAIN, 4TH BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA- 560010 4. SRIPAL KUMAR MOHANLAL AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 979, GROUND FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29594 WP No. 9232 of 2026 4TH BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560010 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAYSHAM JAYASIMHA RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU METRO RAIL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, 3RD FLOOR, BMTC COMPLEX, KENGAL HANUMANTHIAH ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. 2. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHIVAMOGGA ROAD, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, BAGALAKUNTE, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560073 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K KRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. SHILPA SHAH., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.03.2026 MADE BY THE PETITIONERS (ANNEXURE-E, PG, 62-65) THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29594 WP No. 9232 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authority to consider the representation dated 10.03.2026 made by the Petitioners. (Annexure- E, Pq- 62-65) ii. Issue any other appropriate writ, order, or direction restraining the Respondents from causing any obstruction on the service road abutting Item Nos. 1 and 2 of the Schedule Property, or from utilizing the same for any purpose whatsoever, including parking, in a manner that impedes or interferes with the free flow of traffic and unhindered access to the Schedule Property iii. Pass such other reliefs as deemed fit in the interests of justice and equity. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition, which reads as under:- “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The Petitioners above named most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the Petitioners to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to give fresh representation to the Respondent No.1 and file a fresh writ petition in the event need arises, in the interest of justice and equity.” - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29594 WP No. 9232 of 2026 3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that no liberty is granted as such. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38