Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23150 (AP)

VENKATA SWAMY @ BABU v. THE STATE OF AP

CRLP/6627/2024 · 2026-03-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010409632024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6627/2024 Between: 1. VENKATA SWAMY @ BABU, S/O. VENKATA SWARNY AGED 60YEARS,OCCUPATION CULTIVATION, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE, ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 2. PYLA DEMUDAMMA @ PEDA AMMULU,, W/O. VENKATASWAMY @ BABU, AGED 53YEARS, OCCUPATION CULTIVATION, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 3. PYLA GOPI, PYLA GOPI, S/O. VENKATASWAMY BABU, AGED 23YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE, ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 4. PYLA NARSIMHA NAIDU, (DIED). 5. PYLA GANGATHALLI,, W/O NARASIMHANAIDU (LATE). AGED 42YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE. ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 6. PYLA SANYASI NAIDU,, S/O LATE NARASIMHANAIDU, AGED 30YEARS, OCC PRIVATE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE.ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 7. KUNDRAPU VENKATARAO,, S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED 45YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE, ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 8. . KUNDRAPU VARAKASHMI, , W/O. VENKATARAO, AGED 32YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE, ATCHUTAPURAM (M). 9. KUNDRAPU SATYANARAYANA @ SATYA,, S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED 43YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE. ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 10.KUNDRAPU SATYAVATHI,, W/O RAMASWAMY (LATE) AGED 60 2 YEARS, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE, ATCHUTAPURAM(M). 11.DHARMIREDDY KRISHNA, , S/O. KONDADU(LATE), AGED 45YARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE, ATCHUTAPURAM (M) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 2.PETAKAMSETTY RAMASWAMY NAIDU, S/O NARASINGARAO, AGED 59 YEARS. BUSINESS, RESIDING AT. PLOT.NO. 302, VLR VISION DWARAKANAGAR, 3RD LINE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.V V RAVI PRASAD 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Ms. P.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the case has become settled before the Lok Adalath. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J 3 Dt: 17.03.2026 VTS