Bandari Shiva Rama Krishna Prasad S/o Janardhan Rao v. Municipal Commissioner
WP/33037/2013 · 2026-03-05
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23147 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23147 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010407852013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 33037/2013 Between:
1. BANDARI SHIVA RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD S/O JANARDHAN RAO, OCC: OWNER SRI SAI MANI DURGA PLOUR MILLS, NANDIGAMA KRISHNA DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDIGAMA MUNICIPALITY, KRISHNA DIST.
2. KURAPATI SATYANARAYANA S/O VEERAIAH, R/O H.NO.28-55, RAMANNAPET ROAD, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SAIDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M K RAJ KUMAR
2. VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA The Court made the following:
2
ORAL ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner.
2. Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1 and Sri G. Sai Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.K. Raj Kumar, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 are present.
3. On 02.03.2026, when this Writ Petition was listed, none appeared for the Writ Petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
4. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner.
5. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt:06.03.2026 Vns