- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29092 RPFC No. 69 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 69 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SHRI. SURAJ CHERIAN S/O LATE SHRI. THOMAS C. CHERIAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT ANRIYA APARTMENT, NO.1504, NO.8, 5TH MAIN, RMV II STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 094. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AHMED SUHAIB, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ROSA PARAMEL, ADVOCATE) AND: MASTER SHEHAN S/O SURAJ CHERIAN AND SHEELA BAJAJ AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIENDS, SMT. SHEELA BAJAJ Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29092 RPFC No. 69 of 2022 W/O SHRI. SURAJ CHERIAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.182, 18TH A MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.12.2021 PASSED IN C.MISC.No.363/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29092 RPFC No. 69 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Sri.Ahmed Suhaib representing Sri. Rosa Paramel learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not evincing any interest in the matter. Learned counsel also states that though the intimidation regarding retirement from the case was sent to the petitioner to the given address, the same could not be served. Learned counsel thereby seeks to pass necessary orders. 2. On 21.07.2025 following order was passed "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they tried to contact the petitioner but the petitioner's whereabouts are not known. Hence, it is submitted that the petition may be dismissed. Registry is directed to issue Court Notice" 3. Notice sent to the petitioner by the Court returned with an endorsement that the Door of the house as per the residential particulars furnished by the petitioner was found locked and on enquiry, the manager of the apartment informed the process server that the petitioner is in a foreign country. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29092 RPFC No. 69 of 2022 4. Having filed a case, it is for the petitioner to pursue the matter diligently. In the case on hand, the counsel chosen and appointed by the petitioner himself as well as this Court could not trace out the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is of the view that there are no grounds to keep the revision petition pending. 5. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2