Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23141 (JHR)

MAYNO MURMU @ MAINO MURMU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2510/2026 · 2026-08-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25356 -1- Cr.M.P. No. 2510 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- Cr.M.P. No. 2510 of 2026 ---- Mayno Murmu @ Maino Murmu, aged about 50 years, wife of Chales Hansda, resident of Village Khajurdanga, PO and PS Hiranpur, District Pakur …… …. .... Petitioner(s) -- Versus -- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Bajiram @ Bajiram Marandi, son of Queta Marandi, resident of Village Mahku, PO and PS Ranga, District Sahibganj 3.Dilip Thakur, son of not known to the Opposite party resident of Village Jhiktiya, PO Barharwa, PS Ranga, District Sahibganj 4.Som Murmu, son of not known to the Opposite party resident of Village Mahku, PO Barharwa, PS Ranga, District Sahibganj 5.Rahul Mandal, son of Chitro Mandal, resident of Villager Gilha, Labri, PO and PS Barhait, District Sahibganj 6.Polina Marandi, daughter of Bajiram @ Bajiram Marandi, resident of Village Mahku, PO Barharwa, PS Ranga, Dist. Sahibganj 7.Jashmin Hansda @ Jashmin Hembram, wife of Bajiram @ Bajiram Marandi 8.Badki Hansda, wife of Wakil Marandi Opposite Parties No.4, 5, 7 and 8 are residents of Village Mahku, PO Barharwa, PS Ranga, District Sahibganj …. Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner(s) :- None For the State :- None ---- 2026:JHHC:25356 -2- Cr.M.P. No. 2510 of 2026 4/21.08.2026 On repeated calls, nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent State. 2. The prayer in this petition has been made for restoration of Cr.Revision No.436 of 2024 which has been dismissed for default on 17.01.2026 for non-compliance of the order dated 18.12.2025. 3. It has been averred in the petition that all the defects have already been removed and the matter was not listed for a long period and undertaking is given in paragraph no.7 that if any surviving defect is there, it will be removed. 4. Taking into account the averments made in the petition, it appears that sufficient ground is made out for restoration of Cr. Revision No.436 of 2024 and as such, Cr.Revision No.436 of 2024 is, hereby, restored to its original file. 5. This petition is disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated : 21.08.2026 SI/