1 2026:CGHC:25862 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4068 of 2022 Rajendra Kannoje S/o Late Shri Janak Lal Kannoje Aged About 67 Years R/o Quarter No. 6/26, Road No. 26. Ispat Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector / District Magistrate Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Idris Ahmad S/o Nawab Ahmad Aged About 42 Years Incharge Officer, Artha Tatwa Credit Cooperative Society Limited, Office At Azad Chowk, Bhilai -3,, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ashwani Pandey S/o Late Rajendra Pandey Aged About 45 Years R/o 635/24, Shilapara, Near Government Forrest Depot, Raipura, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Rohit Khare S/o Purushottam Khare R/o Supela, Plot No. 10, Priyadarshaniya Parisar, Supela, Tahsil Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.06.25 18:12:33 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. GA SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/06/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : 10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to pay the petitioner his invested amount to the tune of Rs.8,50,000/- out of the property attached by the respondent No.3 in his order dated 09- 10- 2017 (Annexure P-5) and the interest may also be provided over the said amount. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take decision over the claim of petitioner for return for his invested amount, for which application in prescribed formate made by the petitioner before the respondent No.3, which is Annexure P-3. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit and appropriate. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as final order has been passed on 14.6.2021 by the competent authority. However, he prays for liberty to challenge the said order. 3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as having infructuous. However, the petitioner is granted the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay