Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23138 (JHR)

SURESH GIRI @ PAPPU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7699/2026 · 2026-08-19

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:24943 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7699 of 2026 With I.A. No. 10898 of 2026 Suresh Giri @ Pappu, aged about 45 years, son of Late Satyarai Giri, resident of Holding No. 23, Line No. 1, B-Block, Namda Basti, P.O. & P.S.- Golmuri, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Niharika Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, APP For the Informant : Mr. Praveen Shankar Prasad, Advocate : Mr. Ravikant Sandilya, Advocate --- 05/19.08.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2026 in connection with Telco P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025, registered under Sections 64(1), 333, 115(2), 76, 77, 123, 352 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2026 and by now charge sheet must have been submitted. She submits that an interlocutory application being I.A. No. 10898 of 2026 has been filed indicating that the petitioner and the victim have no surviving grievance. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the informant, who also happens to be the victim, has submitted that the victim has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that charge sheet must have been submitted by now. She submits that if the victim has no objection, the State has nothing to say. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions and charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on 2026:JHHC:24943 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Telco P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not disturb the victim in any manner. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. I.A. No. 10898 of 2026 is disposed of. 10. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:19.08.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:20.08.2026