APHC010403752022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25037/2022 Between: 1. BALUSU VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.PATTABHIRAMANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, D.NO.2 MASIDHUVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 2. PASALA SRIHARI,, S/O.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 40 YEARS D.NO.7-105, PASALAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURU MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 3. PASALA VIDHYADHAR,, S/O.VENKATRAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-96, PASALAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURURAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 4. VYTLA CHANDRASEKHAR,, S/O.DORAYYA, AGED 28 YEARS,R/O.D.NO.8 CHELLURURAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 5. VOBHILINENI SHIVAJI,, S/O.V.V.S.R.PRASAD, AGED 40YEARS R/O.D.NO.3-91, MAIN ROAD, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ASEEMA DISTRICT. 6. BALUSU BRAHMAJI RAO,, S/O.SOMARAJU, AGED 57 YEAR D.NO.2-100, MASIDHUVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KON IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25037/2022 BALUSU VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.PATTABHIRAMANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, D.NO.2 MASIDHUVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. PASALA SRIHARI,, S/O.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 40 YEARS 105, PASALAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURU MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. PASALA VIDHYADHAR,, S/O.VENKATRAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. 96, PASALAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURURAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. VYTLA CHANDRASEKHAR,, S/O.DORAYYA, AGED 28 YEARS,R/O.D.NO.8-68, VYTLAVARIVEE CHELLURURAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. VOBHILINENI SHIVAJI,, S/O.V.V.S.R.PRASAD, AGED 40YEARS 91, MAIN ROAD, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ASEEMA DISTRICT. BALUSU BRAHMAJI RAO,, S/O.SOMARAJU, AGED 57 YEAR 100, MASIDHUVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, ...PETITIONER(S) AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BALUSU VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.PATTABHIRAMANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, D.NO.2-100, MASIDHUVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, PASALA SRIHARI,, S/O.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 40 YEARS 105, PASALAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM PASALA VIDHYADHAR,, S/O.VENKATRAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. 96, PASALAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURURAYAVARAM VYTLA CHANDRASEKHAR,, S/O.DORAYYA, AGED 28 68, VYTLAVARIVEEDHI, CHELLURURAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. VOBHILINENI SHIVAJI,, S/O.V.V.S.R.PRASAD, AGED 40YEARS 91, MAIN ROAD, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, BALUSU BRAHMAJI RAO,, S/O.SOMARAJU, AGED 57 YEARS 100, MASIDHUVEEDHI, CHELLURU RAYAVARAM MANDAL, ...PETITIONER(S) 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PANCHAYAT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETERIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, AMALAPURAM KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 3. GRAMAPANCHAYAT, CHELLURU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHELLURU VILLAGE, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT 4. GRAMPANCHAYAT, CHELURU REPRESENTED BY ITS SARPANCH SMT. PALIKA RAGHAVA, CHELLUR VILLAGE RAYAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ ofMandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in putting lock and seal over Rytu Bhavanam premises without issuing any notice or invoking the procedure of law as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Art 300-A of the constitution and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to remove the lock and seal over the premises of Rytubhavanam and further not to interfere with the petitioners right and enjoyment over the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to remove the lock and seal over the premises of Rytubhavanam and not to interfere with the enjoyment of the petitioners and villagers over the same pending disposal of the writ petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the orders passed in IA.No. 1 of 2022 in WP.No. 25037 of 2022 dated 16-12-2022 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim order dt. 16.12.2022 pursuant to IA No. 1/2022 in WP.No. 25037 of 2022 and to dismiss above writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to receive the documents filed along with petition as an additional material papers in the above. Writ Petition by recording above facts and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M BALANAGA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. V SAI KUMAR 3. N.SRIHARI (Standing counsel for ZPP MPP AND GRAM PAN) The Court made the following: ORDER Questioning the action for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 in putting lock and seal to Rythu Bhavanam premises without issuing any notice or invoking the procedure contemplated under law, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Sri M.Balanaga Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that pursuant to the Interim Order granted by this Court dated 16.12.2022, the authorities have opened the lock of the subject property. 3. The material available on record shows that the Grama Sabha passed a resolution dated on 25.07.2024 and in the presence of the villagers the property was delivered to the petitioner. In view of the representation made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the authorities have opened the lock of the subject property, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and the same can be closed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR