APHC010408782023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.20883 of 2023 Between: 1. SMT. GURAJAPU RAJARATNAM,, W/O LATE NAGENDRA RAO, HINDU, AGED 64 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF KANCHARA VEEDHI, VERAVARAPUPETA,TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 2. GURAJAPU SATYADEV,, S/O LATE NAGENDRA RAO, HINDU, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KANCHARA VEEDHI, VERAVARAPUPETA,TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. GURAJAPU VEERENDRAKUMAR,, S/O LATE NAGENDRA RAO, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KANCHARA VEEDHI, VERAVARAPUPETA,TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. GORTHI GANGA MAHALAKSHMI,, D/O LATE GURAJAPU NAGENDRA RAO (W/O GORTHI VASUDEVA RAO), HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SUJATHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), NELAPADU, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. THE RDO AND SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, CUM,- TRIBUNAL UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CIVIZEISHIP ACT 2002 PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. GURAJAPU KOTI RAMAMURTHY, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 2 YEARS, 5-5-15, EGALAVARI VEEDHI, BANK COLONY, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT 7. GURAJAPU VENKATESWARARAO, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED 62 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.5-5-15, EEGALAVARI VEEDHI, BANK COLONY, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 8. GURAJAPU BRAHMAJI, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BANK COLONY, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 9. GURAJAPU BANGARRJU, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BANK COLONY, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 10. GURAJAPU SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE SURYAPRAKASA RAO, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF OPP. GAS COMPANY, BANK COLONY, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Prohibition restraining the 3rd respondent from proceeding with O.P.No.6 of 2023 without having statutory jurisdiction, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and contrary to articles 14 and 300 a of constitution of India, and consequently command the respondents not interfere with the properties of petitioners covered by regd. partition deed and regd. settlement deed dated 07.02.2019. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: "……to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Prohibition restraining the 3rd respondent from proceeding with O.P.No.6 of 2023 without having statutory jurisdiction, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and contrary to articles 14 and 300A of Constitution of India, and consequently, command the respondents not to interfere with the properties of petitioners covered by regd. partition deed and regd. settlement deed dated 07.02.2019, and pass such other orders……" 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed written instructions addressed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 03.12.2025 to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, indicating O.P.No.06 of 2023 filed by the unofficial respondents under the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens, has been disposed of by the Revenue Divisional Officer, vide order dated 01.07.2024, directing both the parties to approach competent Civil Court to resolve their dispute. As there are no adverse orders passed against the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition. 4 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 22.01.2026 Siva/JAK 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.20883 of 2023 Date: 22.01.2026 Siva/JAK