RAHUL KUMAR DAS ALIAS RAHUL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1104/2026 · 2026-03-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2313 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2313 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:6109] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1104 of 2026
------ Rahul Kumar Das @ Rahul Kumar, aged about 27 years, son of Arvind Kumar Das, resident of Village Chanddih, P.O. and P.S. Kunda, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-09-03-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.169 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D & 84C of the I.T. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cyber fraud by posing as a Phone-Pe Customer Care Officer and gave false promise of lottery and thereby deceived gullible people. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.12.2025 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegations have already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 27.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 947 of 2026 and the
order dated 26.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 816 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.169 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 09.03.2026 Saroj/