1 APHC010470422009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22799/2009 Between: 1. SRI SYAMALAMBA AMMAVARI TEMPLE,, VELUGBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS ASADI (ARCHAKA), SRI Y.N. MURTHY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, MULTI ZONE-I ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, RAMA RAOPET, KALINDA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. PEDDISETTY VENKATANANDAM, S/O.LATE VEERA RAGHAVULU R/O. VELUGUBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned order dt. 25-7-2008 made in appeal No. 180/2007 on the file of 1st respondent, declaring the 3rd respondent as landless poor tenant, and directing the 3rd 2 respondent to pay rent 2/3rd of market value; and quash the same as being bad, illegal, without jurisdiction and invalid IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 29602 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspension of operation of the impugned order Dt. 25-7-2008 made in Appeal No. 180/2007 on the file of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 5 OF 2009(WVMP 140059 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 24699 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP 31444 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the name of the 3rd respondent by making necessary correction as "Sri Peddisetti Venkatanandam, S/o. Late Veera Raghavulu, Velugubanda Village, Rajanagaram (M), E.G. District" instead of Smt. Peddisetty Venkata Padmavathi, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, in the above mentioned writ petition No. 22799 of 2009 as well as WPMP No. 29602/2009 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS WRIT PETITION NO: 22798/2009 3 Between: 1. SRI SYAMALAMBA AMMAVARI TEMPLE,, VELUGBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS ASADI (ARCHAKA), SRI Y.N. MURTHY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, MULTI ZONE-I ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, RAMA RAOPET, KALINDA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. PEDDISETTY VENKATANANDAM, S/O.LATE VEERA RAGHAVULU, R/O. VELUGUBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned order dt. 25-7-2008 made in appeal No. 181/2007 on the file of 1st respondent, declaring the 3rd respondnet as landless poor tenant, and directing the 3rd respondent to pay rent 2/3rd of market value; and quash the same as being bad, illegal, without jurisdiction and invalid IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WVMP 4170 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the stay granted in WPMP No. 29601/09 in WP No. 22798/09 dated 23-10-2009 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP 29601 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 4 suspension of operation of the impugned order Dt. 25-7-2008 made in Appeal No. 181/2007 on the file of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 24698 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP 31443 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the name of the 3rd respondent by making necessary correction as "Sri Peddisetti Venkatanandam, S/o. Late Veera Raghavulu, Velugubanda Village, Rajanagaram (M), E.G. District" instead of Smt. Peddisetty Venkata Padmavathi, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, in the above mentioned writ petition No. 22798 of 2009 as well as WPMP No. 29601/2009 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS WRIT PETITION NO: 22800/2009 Between: 1. SRI SYAMALAMBA AMMAVARI TEMPLE,, VELUGBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS ASADI (ARCHAKA), SRI Y.N. MURTHY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, MULTI ZONE-I ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, RAMA RAOPET, KALINDA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SMT PEDDISETTY PADMAVATHI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, R/O. VELUGUBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned order dt. 25-7-2008 made in appeal No. 179/2007 os the file of 1st respondent, delaying the 3rd respondnet as landless poor tenant, and directing the 3rd respondent to pay rent 2/3rd of market value; and quash the same as being bad, illegal, without jurisdiction and invalid IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WVMP 4171 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted in WPMP No. 29603/09 in WP NO. 22800/09 dt. 23- 10-2009 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP 29603 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To suspension of operation of the impugned order Dt.25.07.2008 made in Appeal No.179/2007 on the file of 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above appeal, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 6 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22799, 22798 & 22800 of 2009 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER:- Heard Sri Kappera Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner; learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing for respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3. 2. When the matters are taken up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the unofficial respondent did not comply with the order of the Tribunal. In view of the same, the unofficial respondent was evicted from the subject land, and an auction was conducted for the grant of leasehold rights in respect of the subject property. 3. Having regard to the same, the learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in the Writ Petitions does not survive, and no further orders are required to be passed in the Writ Petitions. 4. In view of the above foregoing, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 7 As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:06.01.2026 MVK 8 353 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NOS:22799, 22798 & 22800 of 2009 Date:06.01.2026 MVK 9