Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23124 (JHR)

KANHAI BAURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6668/2026 · 2026-08-18

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:24851 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6668 of 2026 Kanhai Bauri, aged about 28 years, S/o Jadu Bauri, resident of Village- Basantpur, P.O. Sardaha, P.S. Pindrajora, District- Bokaro. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Victim … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- 05/18.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Learned counsel for the State is also present. 3. Learned counsel for the informant Mr. Jawahar Prasad, Advocate and Mr. Laxman Kumar, Advocate is present. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2026 in connection with Chas Mahila Police Station No. 4 of 2026 for the alleged offence registered under Section 69 of B.N.S. pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro. Charge has been framed. 5. To this, learned counsel for the informant/victim has submitted that the next date for production of witness before the court is in the next week. 6. At this, learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that a sample has been sent for DNA test, but the report is still awaited. 7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has submitted that the statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 183 BNSS be perused by this court. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant has opposed the prayer for bail. 8. Upon going through the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS it appears that she has declared her age as 27 years and has also stated that the petitioner is the brother-in-law of her sister and there was love relationship between the two for 6-7 months and in 2026:JHHC:24851 2 the meantime, the petitioner had promised to marry with her and established relationship with her and consequently she became pregnant, and subsequently he refused to marry. The DNA report still awaited. 9. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she has stated that there was love relationship for last 6-7 months and charge having already been framed, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with Chas Mahila Police Station No. 4 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 10. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 11. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 18.08.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-20.08.2026