Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23121 (KAR)

C S MANJUNATHA v. C N MEENA NAGARAJ IAS

CCC/320/2026 · 2026-06-22

K S Hemalekha

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30752-DB CCC No. 320 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.320 OF 2026 BETWEEN: C.S. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE SIDDARAMAPPA, AGE 36 YEARS, R/O CHEERANAHALLI VILLAGE, SHIVANI HOBLI, AJJAMPURA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 547. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. R. SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. C.N. MEENA NAGARAJ, IAS., THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHIKKAMAGALUR - 577 101. 2. RAJESH H.D. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKKAMAGALUR SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALUR - 577 101. 3. VINAYAAKA THE TAHSHILDAR, AJJAMPURA TALUK, AJJAMPURA - 577 547. …ACCUSED Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30752-DB CCC No. 320 of 2026 4. THE STATE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE IN NOT COMPLYING THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.7399/2025 DATED 24.04.2025. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 24.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.7399/2025 [KLR-RR/SUR]. In terms of the said order, the Court inter alia directed the accused to register the name of the complainant in the revenue records as Kathedar. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30752-DB CCC No. 320 of 2026 2. The complainant is claiming land measuring 2 acres and 19 guntas on the basis of a grant certificate issued in favour of his father. 3. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the accused has filed a compliance affidavit, enclosing therewith a letter dated 20.06.2026. It is stated that a survey was conducted and the complainant was found to be in possession of only one acre of land. Out of the said extent, 24 guntas form part of the forest land and therefore, the complainant cannot be recorded as the Kathedar thereof. The remaining 16 guntas, falling in Survey No.50, situated at Shivani Hobli, Cheeranahalli Village, Ajjampura Taluk is proposed to be recorded in the name of the complainant and steps in that regard have already been initiated. 4. It is also pointed out that the learned Single Judge had granted liberty to the Deputy Commissioner to consider the validity of the grant, as permitted by the Court in the earlier writ petition [W.P. No.29469/1982]. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits that, in exercise of the said liberty, proceedings have now been initiated - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30752-DB CCC No. 320 of 2026 to verify the genuineness and authenticity of the grants made in favour of Sri Shankarachari and ten others in Survey No.50, Cheeranahalli Village, Shivani Hobli, Ajjampura Taluk [formerly Tarikere-Taluk], under the Unauthorised Cultivation [Bagar Hukum] Scheme. 6. In view of the above, we are unable to accept that there is any willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. 7. Accordingly, the complaint is closed. 8. However, we clarify that this order will not preclude the complainant from availing any substantive remedies, in accordance with law. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19