Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2312 (BOM)

WATHAR BUDRUK VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHAKARI SOCIETY LTD. THR. CHAIRMAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. CO OPERATIVE DEPT. AND ORS.

WP/3997/2026 · 2026-08-19

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

902-3997-2026-WP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3997 OF 2026 Wathar Budruk Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Kalpesh U. Patil for the Petitioner Mr. Ruturaj Pawar for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 Mr. J.P. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1 - State …………. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026. P. C. : . Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition, which raises a challenge to communication dated 13.08.2026. 3. Learned counsel Mr. Kalpesh Patil seeks liberty to approach the Election Officer under Rule 11(2) the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 agitating the objections for inclusion of the petitioner society in the provisional voters’ list. The election programme is also placed on record which stipulates 18.08.2026 as a date for declaration of provisional voters’ list and period of 18.08.2026 to 27.08.2026 for raising objections. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2026.08.20 14:42:32 +0530 902-3997-2026-WP=.doc 4. Mr. Pawar, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4 submits that if the objections are raised that will be dealt with in accordance with law. 5. The Writ Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek redressal by approaching Election Officer under Rule 11 Sub-Rule (2) and the communication dated 13.08.2026 shall not be an impediment. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2