APHC010402282024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 907/2024 Between: 1. SINGAMSETTY PREM KUMAR, S/O SESHAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 2-286, UNDAVALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SINGAMSETTY MARUTHI SUSMITA, W/O PREM KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, D.NO2-1-297B, ARIGAVARI STREET, GADDALAGUNTAPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SINGAMSETTY ABHINAV KRISHNA SAI KARTHIKEYA, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS BEING MINOR HE IS REPRESENTED BY 2ND RESPONDENT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case against the orders passed in CrI.MP No.136 of 2023 in MC No.41 of 2019 on the file of court of the Family-Cum-VIII Additional District Judge : Prakasam at Ongole Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G N V PULLA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: JUDGEMENT: This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’ ) by the Petitioner, aggrieved by the Order dated 08.05.2023 passed in Crl.M.P.No.136 of 2023 in MC No.41 of 2019 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-Cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole. The brief facts of the case are that Petitioner herein and respondent No.2 are husband and wife respectively. Respondent No.3 is their son. Due to disputes between the couple, Petitioner and respondent No.2 are living separately from March, 2016 onwards. Respondent No.2 herein filed MC No.41 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole, seeking monthly maintenance to herself and to her son. In that Maintenance Case, she also filed Crl.M.P.No.136 of 2023 seeking interim maintenance of Rs.15,000/- p.m. each to the Petitioners 2 and 3 for their livelihood. Learned Judge, Family Court by Order dated 08.05.2023 allowed the Crl.M.P.No.136 of 2023 and granted interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month each to the respondents 2 and 3 herein from the date of filing of the Petition. Petitioner/husband impugned challenged the said Order dated 08.05.2023 in this Criminal Revision Case. Heard Sri G.N.V.Pulla Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent State. Perused the material on record. 3 Learned counsel for the Petitioner after arguing for some time, would submit that since the respondent No.3 is pursuing his studies and respondent No.2 is unable to maintain herself and her son(respondent No.3), let there be a direction to the trial Court for speedy disposal of MC No.41 of 2019 by granting liberty to the Petitioner to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court in the maintenance case. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the learned Judge, Family Court-cum- VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole is directed to dispose of MC No.41 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible without granting any adjournment in a casual way by mere asking and report the progress of the matter to the Registrar(Judicial) by 01.03.2026. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 27.01.2026 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Criminal Revision Case No. 907 of 2024 27.01.2026 Mjl /*