[2026:JHHC:24282] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7587 of 2026 ------ 1. Mukesh Yadav @ Sichiliya aged 45 years, S/o late Bhajo Yadav, Resident of Village – Choudharydih, P.O.+P.S.- Lodipur, District – Bhagalpur (Bihar). 2. Rahul Kumar aged 25 years, S/o Mukesh Ram, Resident of Village – Manikpur, P.O.+P.S. – Babarganj, District – Bhagalpur (Bihar) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ashish Kr. Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukal, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-13-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305, 333, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have committed theft in the house of the informant and taken out gold and silver ornaments. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is then submitted that the petitioners are not named in the FIR and only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused – Kaila @ Kanhaiya Ravidas @ Kanhai Ravidas, the petitioners have been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 06.02.2026 as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6141 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 13.08.2026 Saroj/