MS MANTHAN HEALTHCARE v. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS
/16824/2026 · 2026-05-26
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23109 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23109 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 129
CWP-16824-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026
M/S MANTHAN HEALTHCARE ...Petitioner Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS.
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Eklavya Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate and
Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate
for respondent-U.T. Chandigarh
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 20.04.2026 whereby respondent has cancelled his provisional registration certificate issued under Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner at this stage would be redressed if respondent is directed to decide petitioner’s appeal in a time bound manner.
3.
Learned counsel for respondent submits that petitioner’s appeal would be decided expeditiously.
DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.26 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-16824-2026
-2-
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.
5.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to decide petitioner’s appeal within six weeks from today.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE May 26, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.26 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment