Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23107 (HP)

RAKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS

COPC/1215/2026 · 2026-09-15

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:39367 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1215 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.09.2026 Rakesh Kumar and Ors. ….Petitioners Versus Abhishek Jain and Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhunpinder Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated nil along with copy of office order dated 22.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the judgment dated 29.12.2025, passed in CWPNo.20642/2025, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and decided by the respondent-department by way of passing detailed order dated 22.05.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 22.05.2026, if they still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 15, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2