- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31739 WP No. 18330 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 18330 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. NARASHIMAIAH S/O CHIKHANARASHIMIAH THONDHEGERE AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS THAVAREKRE HANCHE TUMAKURU TALUK-572 101 2. CHIKKANARASHIMIAH S/O NARASHIMIAH THONDHEGERE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS THAVAREKRE HANCHE TUMAKURU TALUK-572 101 3. PRAKASH S/O NARASHIMIAH THONDHEGERE AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS THAVAREKRE HANCHE TUMAKURU TALUK-572 101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VINOD GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31739 WP No. 18330 of 2026 M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 2. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 3. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 4. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TUMAKUR-572 101 5. TUMAKUR KYGARIKA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA TUMAKUR-572 101 BY ITS MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4, DATED 03.06.2026 AS PER ANNEXURES-G AND H PROPOSING TO CONDUCT AUCTION OF THE AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE BELOW AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31739 WP No. 18330 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that, there is an alternative and efficacious remedy and he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and pursue the alternative remedy. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, reserving the liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate appellate authority in the manner known to law, the writ petition stands dismissed. 3. If the petitioners prefer an appeal, they will be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 4. Registry is directed to return the original documents to the petitioners after retaining the xerox copy of the same. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2