Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23099 (JHR)

RUSTAM MIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4776/2026 · 2026-08-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:25285 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4776 of 2026 1. Rustam Miya, aged about 46 years, son of Maku Miyan, resident of village Manakdiha, P.O. Parwatpur and P.S. Taratand, District-Giridih 2. Matizan Bibi, aged about 40 years, wife of Rustam Miya, resident of village Manakdiha, P.O. Parwatpur and P.S. Taratand, District-Giridih ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Om Prakash Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P. 02/ 21.08.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Taratand P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026, registered under sections 80(2) read with 3 (5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased and the deceased has hanged herself due to that death has occurred and false allegations are made against these petitioners. He next submits that now good sense has prevailed and informant and petitioners side have compromised the case and compromise petition is annexed as Annexure-2 to this petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that alleged sections are not compoundable and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. On perusal of F.I.R it transpires that allegations are there against the husband of the deceased and so far these petitioners are ( 2026:JHHC:25285 ) concerned, they are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased respectively and in the light of annexure-2 the matter has been compromised between the parties. The deceased has committed suicide by way of hanging herself. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Giridih, in connection with Taratand P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.21.08.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-