DR SUNIL MALHOTRA v. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS
/14664/2026 · 2026-05-26
Suvir Sehgal, Vikas Suri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23097 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23097 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 CWP-14664-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision:26.05.2026 DR. SUNIL MALHOTRA
...PETITIONER VERSUS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate. Mr. Himanshu Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Ritvik Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondent(s)-HSVP. Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate and Mr. Shailesh Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL)
1. On the basis of prayer made in the application (CM-9116-CWP- 2026), which is supported with an affidavit of petitioner, petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
3. Pending application(s) is/are disposed of.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
JUDGE 26.05.2026
(VIKAS SURI) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SHEETAL 2026.05.27 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh