PUSHPENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
EX.P./1480/2026 · 2026-09-16
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23093 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23093 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:39611
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1480 of 2026
Decided on: 16th September, 2026
Pushpender Kumar and others
....Petitioners
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Balwinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that as per the office order dated 27.08.2026, the petitioners have been granted the higher pay scale of Rs.40100 after two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 20243 titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. However, the arrears of the payment on account of allowing the higher pay scale have not been released in favour of the petitioners.
2.
Since the mandate contained in the judgment has substantially been complied with, thereby granting the higher pay scale to the petitioners, nothing remains to be
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:39611 2
adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners within eight weeks from today, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
3.
The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 16th September, 2026
Judge (naveen)