Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9737 of 2026 ====================================================== Mahaveer Prasad, Son of Late Badal Prasad, Resident of Village-Siraha, P.S.- Pakridayal, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Works Department (Gramin Karya Bhibhag), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Pakridayal, East Champaran.
3. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.
4. The Block Development Officer, Pakridayal Block, District-East Champaran.
5. The Circle Officer, Pakridayal Block, East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Advocate (11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 07-07-2026 Heard Mr. Prateek Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
“for issuance of an appropriate writ direction commanding the respondents to remove the encroachment from the khatiyani rayati land of petitioner bearing khata no. 49, khesra no. 5532, Mauja Sirha, Thana no. 141, Pakridayal, East Champaran on which the respondents has filled the Soil for construction of the public road and further be pleased to command the
Patna High Court CWJC No.9737 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026 2/2 respondent to restore the physical possession of the petitioner's private land on which the respondent has illegally started the earth work and soling the bricks for construction of road.”
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be presenting his fresh representation alongwith supporting document before the District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari within a period four weeks.
4. Learned State counsel submits that if such petitioner is preferred, it will be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest.
5. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent, the District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in next four weeks and if such petition alongwith supporting documents are filed, the aforesaid respondent shall be taking up the matter and it is expected that a reasoned order is passed at an earliest.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U