Rednam Maniamma W/o late Venkata Subba Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/28926/2013 · 2026-03-02
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23085 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23085 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010406842013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28926/2013 Between:
1. REDNAM MANIAMMA W/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, R/O D.NO.50-77-18/3, SEETHAMPETA, GOLLA VEEDHI, WARD NO.29, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. REDNAM HARI KUMAR S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, R/O D.NO.7-46/1, SEEMALAPALLI, WARD NO.70, VEPAGUNTA, PENDURTHY MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. REDNAM MAHESWARA RAO S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, R/O VANTHALA STREET, K.R.M.COLONY, WARD NO.6, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM (VUDA), REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. E MADAN MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA
2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV
3. M/S LOTUS LAW FIRM
4. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)
3
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
None appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
2. Sri T.Karthik Chandra Mouli, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S.Ganesh Babu, learned Standing Counsel for VUDA and MUDA.
3. On 24.02.2026, when this Writ Petition was listed, none appeared for the Writ Petitioners. On the direction of the Court the matter is listed today under the caption 8for dismissal9. Today also none appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
4. Having recorded the same and also having regard to the fact that the Writ Petition is pending on the file of this Court since the year 2013, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the Writ Petition.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
_________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.03.2026 RMR
4
129
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.28926 of 2013 03.03.2026
RMR
5
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. W.P.No.28926 of 2013 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE ORDER Office Note
05. 03.03.2026 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J RMR
6