IN THE 212 Sonu State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Ms. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 309(4), Station Balachaur, 2. Learned that the case of accused Roop Chand granted by this Court 2026 and order respectively. 3. Learned 4. I have respective parties. 5. Without consideration that been granted the THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28815 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Palvi Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.09 dated 317(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya alachaur, District SBS Nagar. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would be very similar Chand and Kamal Kumar to whom Court vide order dated 27.04.2026 order dated 14.05.2026 passed Learned State Counsel does not dispute have heard learned counsel appearing parties. Without going into the merits of that co-accused Roop Chand and the concession of regular bail vide PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 28815-2026(O&M) decision: 26.05.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Punjab. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 15.01.2026 registered under Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police behalf of the petitioner contends similar to the case of the co- whom regular bail has been 27.04.2026 passed in CRM-M-21765- passed in CRM-M-26358-2026 dispute the aforesaid facts. appearing on behalf of the of the case and taking into and Kamal Kumar have already vide order dated 27.04.2026 SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.26 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 212 CRM-M-28815-2026(O&M) passed in CRM-M-21765-2026 and order dated 14.05.2026 passed in CRM- M-26358-2026 respectively, thus with a view to extend parity and keeping the case of the present petitioner at par with the co-accused, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 26.05.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.26 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document