Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23081 (KAR)

SRI THIPPESWAMY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/34054/2025 · 2026-06-16

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29159 WP No. 34054 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.34054 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. THIPPESWAMY S/O ANANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O RAMADAS COMPOUND CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA - 577 501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAGANGADHARA G.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHTIRADURGA SUB DIVISION CHITRADURGA - 577 501. 3. THE THASILDAR CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA - 577 501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29159 WP No. 34054 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT GIVEN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 THASILDAR, CHITRADURGA, BEARING NO.RRTKCR/295/2025- 26 DATED 09.10.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 THE LEARNED THASILDAR, CHITRADURGA TO MAKE OUT KHATHA AND PAHANI IN RESPECT OF SY. NO. 8/1A1 MEASURING 14 ACRES 30 GUNTAS OF KALLENAHALLI VILALGE KASABA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 09.10.2025 (Annexure-G) passed by respondent No.3. 2. Having taken note of the endorsement at Annexure-G, I am of the view that, petitioner is having efficacious remedy under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and therefore, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29159 WP No. 34054 of 2025 3. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, the Writ Petition is dismissed. 4. All contentions raised in this Writ Petition are open to be urged before the competent authority. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18