Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2308 (JHR)

DR REKHA ROY v. THE SECRETARY JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

WPC/251/2023 · 2026-02-09

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3364 1 W.P.(C) No. 251 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 251 of 2023 Dr. Rekha Roy, Aged about 47 years, W/o Ravindra Kumar Singh, Resident of Kunti Kunj, New Nagra Toli, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Lalpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) …....... Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1.The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Office at Circular Road, P.O.- G.P.O, P.S.- Lalpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand 2.The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Office at Circular Road, P.O.- G.P.O, P.s.- Lalpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, Ground Floor, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O.-P.S.- Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 4.The Director, RINPAS, Kanke, P.O. & P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 5.The State of Jharkhand .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Karan, Advocate For the Resp.-JPSC : Mr. Pravin Kr. Pandey, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate 06/09.02.2026 In compliance of order dated 20.022023 counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent-JPSC. The relevant para 12 of the said counter affidavit dated 12.08.2024 reads as under: “12. That it is humbly stated and submitted that the advertisement vide Adv. No.15/2022 for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor (Psychiatric Social Work) in Ranchi Institute of Neuro-Psychiatry & Allied Sciences (RINPAS) has cancelled by commission due to the non- receiving of sufficient No. of application form accordingly commission has issued press communiqué vide Memo No. 1709 dated 05.07.2024 and same has uploaded on the commission's website.” 2026:JHHC:3364 2 W.P.(C) No. 251 of 2023 2. Thus, there is no subsisting cause of action. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 09.02.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026