SHOURAV YADAV @ GOURAV YADAV @ SHOURAV KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7657/2026 · 2026-08-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23079 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23079 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:24415] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7657 of 2026
------ Shourav Yadav @ Gourav Yadav @ Sourav Kr. Aged about 18 years, Son of Umesh Yadav, resident of village-Choudhary Dih Shanti (Mahagama), P.O. & P.S. Mahagama, District-Godda (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Mridula Thakur, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-14-08-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305, 333, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft in the house of the informant and taken away gold and silver ornaments. It is submitted that allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 11 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2026 in B.A. No. 6141 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted the petitioner has been in custody since 11.05.2026 mentioned in para-11 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 14.08.2026 Amar/