Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23070 (CHH)

Smt. Malti Bai v. DANESHWAR SINGH RAGHUVANSHI

MAC/553/2021 · 2026-06-22

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25737 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 553 of 2021 1 - Smt. Malti Bai W/o Amonakdas Manikpuri, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Chulgahan, Post Office Ranitarai, Police Station Ranitarai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Daneshwar Singh Raghuvanshi Son Of Chain Singh Raghuvanshi , Resident Of Village Chulgahan, Post Office Ranitarai, Police Station Ranitarai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Driver And Owner Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration C.G. 05- D-0581). 2 - Divisional Manager Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company, Resident Of Shiv Mohan, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri , Raipur , Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Bisahin Bai W/o Late Ghanshyam Baghel Resident Of Village Gujra Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - Shanti Bai W/o Late Ghanshyam Baghel, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Chulgahan, Post Office Ranitarai, Police Station Ranitarai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellants : None. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 23/06/2026 1. Today, none appears on behalf of the appellant even when the case is called in the second round. It is further noted that on 14.05.2026 also, no one had appeared on behalf of the 2 appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge $ourabh