Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Ct. No.4 D/L 12.06.2026 (Naba) 14 W.P.S.T. 91 of 2024
Smt. Tukul Sarkar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Chandreyi Alam, ld. A.G.P., Ms. Kakali Dutta ...for the State
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. State is represented.
3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion i.e. 07.05.2026, nobody was present to represent the petitioner.
4. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the case.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)