Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23068 (CAL)

TUKUL SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WP.ST/91/2024 · 2026-06-12

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L 12.06.2026 (Naba) 14 W.P.S.T. 91 of 2024 Smt. Tukul Sarkar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Chandreyi Alam, ld. A.G.P., Ms. Kakali Dutta ...for the State 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. State is represented. 3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion i.e. 07.05.2026, nobody was present to represent the petitioner. 4. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the case. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default. 6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)