- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29715 WP NO.25387 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25387 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. H.G. RUDRAPRAKASH S/O GURU CHANNA BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O HONNNUDIKE VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 122. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH K.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENR OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, BERASANDRA, DEVENAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29715 WP NO.25387 OF 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, DODDABALLAPUR - 561 203. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. ESWARAPPA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31ST AUGUST, 2018 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.LRF:SR(DO):278/2012-13 VIDE ANNEXURE-D; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT-AUTHORITIES TO RESTORE THE REVENUE ENTRIES RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER PURSUANT TO THE SALE DEED DATED 18TH MAY, 2012 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 31st August, 2018 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner in Case No.LRF:SR(D):278/2012-13, wherein, the subject land has been restored in favour of the State Government by declaring the registered Sale Deed dated 18th May, 2012 executed in favour of the petitioner as void. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29715 WP NO.25387 OF 2025 2. Heard Sri. Ramesh K.R., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. B.J. Eswarappa, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of impugned order dated 31st August, 2018 (Annexure-D), the same would indicate that the proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner under Section 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. It is also forthcoming that the petitioner herein remained absent in the impugned proceedings. On perusal of the Annexure-G, it is forthcoming that, under similar circumstances, this Court, in Writ Petition No.20349 of 2023 disposed of on 01st April, 2025 (Annexure-G), allowed the petition and directed the revenue authorities to restore the name of the petitioners in the revenue records. Paragraphs 1 to 4 of the said order reads as under: "1. An order of vesting passed by the Assistant Commissioner for contravention of Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961("the Act', for short) is challenged in this petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29715 WP NO.25387 OF 2025 2. The Assistant Commissioner proceeded to pass the impugned order on the ground that the petitioners have not produced any relevant documents despite service of notice. In essence, the impugned order passed was without hearing or without considering the claims of the purchasers. Since the order of vesting would take away the rights of the ownership of land in question, the appropriate course would be to afford one more opportunity to the petitioners. 3. In the normal course, the matter would have to be remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, since Sections 79A and 79B of the Act were omitted by virtue of an amendment to the Land Reforms Act, no useful purpose would be served by remanding the matter to the Assistant Commissioner and hence, the impugned proceedings initiated shall stand abated. 4. In view of the above, the revenue authorities to restore the name of the petitioners in the revenue record." 4. Therefore, following the law declared by this Court in the aforesaid petition, I am of the considered opinion that the facts of the case in hand are similar to that of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition. Accordingly, impugned order dated 31st August, 2018 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.3 in Case No.LRF:SR(D):278/2012-13 is hereby quashed; and respondent-Authorities are directed to - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29715 WP NO.25387 OF 2025 restore the entries in the revenue records in respect of the schedule property in favour of the petitioner herein, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. In the result, writ petition is allowed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69