Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23052 (AP)

POTHU PURUSHOTHAM REDDY v. SHAIK NASEEMA

CRP/4159/2017 · 2026-03-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010403182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4159/2017 Between: 1. POTHU PURUSHOTHAM REDDY, S/O.P.NARAYANA REDDY R/O.D.NO.16-633-3-3, NEAR DY.S.P. BUNGALOW, RAMULA GUDI STREET, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHAIK NASEEMA, W/o. S.Khader Basha R/o.D.No.5/123/1, Somala Bus Stand, Somala Village and Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to CRP against the order dated 04.04.2017 passed in EP No.30/2016 in OS No.1/2015 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 5469 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order dated 04.04.2017 passed in EP No.30/2016 in OS No.1/2015 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, Chittoor District pending disposal of the CRP 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POTHU PURUSHOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. MD SALEEM The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4159 of 2017 ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, challenging the order dated 04.04.2017 in E.P.No.30 of 2016 in O.S.No.1 of 2015 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. On 24.03.2026 this Court passed the following order: “On 11.03.2026, this Court passed the following order:- “Both the parties are directed to get latest instructions with regard to whether the conditional order dated 01.09.2017 is complied or not? Post on 18.03.2026. In the meanwhile, Registry is also directed to communicate copy of this order to the Trial Court and obtain the latest status with regard to depositing of 50% of the decree amount by the petitioner/judgment debtor to the credit of E.P.No.30 of 2016 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.” 2. Again, on 18.03.2026, the matter was adjourned and posted under the caption for orders on 23.03.2026. 4 3. Today, when the matter is called, Sri D.Teja, learned counsel, represents that Sri C.Sharan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, has given up vakalath for the petitioner. 4. Hence, Registry is directed to delete the name of Sri C.Sharan Reddy and print the name of the petitioner, in the cause list. 5. Post on 31.03.2026 under the caption for orders.” 3. Despite reasonable opportunities provided by this Court, the same were not availed by the revision petitioner. 4. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 31.03.2026 RMR 5 80 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4159 of 2017 31.03.2026 W RMR