HEENA KHAN v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2308/2026 · 2026-07-28
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2305 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2305 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No.2308/2026
Heena Khan …..Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. F. S. Butt, Advocate Vs
Union Territory of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Shaliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.07.2026
1. After arguing the matter at some length, Mr. F. S. Butt, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, when confronted with the question of maintainability of the instant writ petition in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Union Territory of J&K and Ors. v. Saba Wani”, sought permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner under law.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition, along with all connected application(s), is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. At this stage, Mr. F. S. Butt, learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner intend to approach the Hon’ble Supreme Court for seeking clarification of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court. Accordingly, while dismissing the present writ petition as withdrawn, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach the Hon’ble Supreme Court for seeking such clarification, if so advised and permissible under law.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 28.07.2026 Shammi
Sr. No. 218 SHAMMI KUMAR 2026.07.28 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document