Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2305 (ALL)

AKHAND NARAYAN SHAKTI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/15194/2026 · 2026-05-06

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 15194 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. This application has been filed for seeking quashing the entire proceedings of Case No.4732 of 2020, (State Vs. Ramprakash Yadav and others) in Case Crime No.0136 of 2017, under Sections 186, 185, 143, 341, 322, 336, 353 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Act, Police Station Mubarakpur, District Azamgarh alongwith order of cognizance dated 25.06.2020 and chargesheet dated 17.05.2017, pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhand Narayan Shakti And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. May 7, 2026 Ashish/- NA528 No. 15194 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad