CR No.4483 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 203-U LAL SINGH AND OTHERS LAL SINGH AND OTHERS LAL SINGH AND OTHERS LAL SINGH AND OTHERS Vs Vs Vs Vs STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Mr. for the petitioner HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. By way of present Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the Execution Singh and others vs. State of Haryana period. [2]. Notice of motion. [3]. On asking of the Court, H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 respectively. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity of calling upon response from the respondent to their interest is being passed. [4]. Briefly stating learned Reference Court on 16.07.2025 before the learned then the same is pending consideration compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioner (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH CR No. CR No. CR No. CR No.4483 4483 4483 4483 Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: LAL SINGH AND OTHERS LAL SINGH AND OTHERS LAL SINGH AND OTHERS LAL SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. AND ORS. AND ORS. AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the Execution Application and others vs. State of Haryana and ors.” Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryan H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity of calling upon response from the respondents at this stage, as no order prejudicial st is being passed. Briefly stating, in view of Award Reference Court, the petitioners filed Execution Petition No. before the learned Additional District the same is pending consideration, however, till date, the enhanced amount of compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 4483 4483 4483 4483 of of of of 2026 2026 2026 2026 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision:26 26 26 26....00005555.202 .202 .202 .2026666 ...... ...... ...... ......Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitionerssss ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondentssss HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MANUJ MANUJ MANUJAAAA petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Application No.369 of 2025 titled as ‘ ” in an expeditious and time bound Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity at this stage, as no order prejudicial Award dated 16.05.2024 passed by the filed Execution Petition No.369 of 2025 District Judge, Gurugram and since however, till date, the enhanced amount of compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioners. 1 petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned titled as ‘Lal time bound and Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity at this stage, as no order prejudicial passed by the 2025 since however, till date, the enhanced amount of MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.26 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR No.4483 of 2026 [5]. Learned counsel for the petitioner aggrieved of the non revision petition for issuance of direction to the to decide the execution application expeditiously, in a time bound manner. [6]. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and paper book. [7]. A perusal of record shows that execution appl petitioner(s) on 16.07 [8]. In (2021) 6 SCC 418 (2021) 6 SCC 418 (2021) 6 SCC 418 (2021) 6 SCC 418 proceedings within 6 months from the date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing [9]. In view of above, the (the Executing Court) is requested to dispose of the Executing Petition No. 2025 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of next 0 from today, as any further delay is going to cause serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioners/land [10]. It is made clear that nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the execution p [11]. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any shall also disposed of. May May May May 26 26 26 26, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable (O&M) Learned counsel for the petitioners aggrieved of the non-disbursal of amount of compensation revision petition for issuance of direction to the to decide the execution application expeditiously, in a time bound manner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and A perusal of record shows that execution appl 16.07.2025 is pending for the adjudication. In Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G (2021) 6 SCC 418 (2021) 6 SCC 418 (2021) 6 SCC 418 (2021) 6 SCC 418 the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as follows: “That the executing Court must dispose of execution proceedings within 6 months from the date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing In view of above, the learned Additional (the Executing Court) is requested to dispose of the Executing Petition No. as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of next 0 from today, as any further delay is going to cause serious prejudice to the rights of /landowners. It is made clear that nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the execution p Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any shall also disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No s submits that the petitioners being amount of compensation have filed the present revision petition for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court concerned to decide the execution application expeditiously, in a time bound manner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through A perusal of record shows that execution application filed by the the adjudication. Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and others andhi and others andhi and others andhi and others reported as the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as follows:- “That the executing Court must dispose of execution proceedings within 6 months from the date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay.” Additional District Judge, Gurugram (the Executing Court) is requested to dispose of the Executing Petition No.369 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of next 06 months from today, as any further delay is going to cause serious prejudice to the rights of It is made clear that nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the execution proceedings. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 being filed the present Executing Court concerned the ication filed by the reported as “That the executing Court must dispose of execution proceedings within 6 months from the date of filing which may be Gurugram 369 of months from today, as any further delay is going to cause serious prejudice to the rights of It is made clear that nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.26 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment