SRI GANOTRI INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI DEEN DAYAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY PR SECRETARY AGRICULTURE ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPTT
WPC/2166/2022 · 2026-08-18
Sri Ananda Sen
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23045 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23045 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:24893 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2166 of 2022 ------ Sri Gangotri Industries, a proprietorship firm, having office at Manki Dhipa, Tatisilwai, P.O. & P.S. Tatisilwai, District Ranchi, through its Proprietor Shri Deen Dayal Singh, son of Shri Lakshmi Narayan Singh, resident of Manki Dhipa, Tatisilwai, P.O. & P.S. Tatisilwai, Town and District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary / Principal Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Co-operative Department, having office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Town and District Ranchi.
2. The Director, Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Co-operative Department, having office at Krishi Bhawan, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Gonda, Town and District Ranchi.
3. State Mission Director-cum-Nodal Officer, National Food Security Mission, having office at Krishi Bhawan, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Gonda, Town and District Ranchi.
4. District Agriculture Officer, Ranchi, having office at Krishi Bhawan, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Gonda, Town and District Ranchi.
5. District Agriculture Officer, West Singhbhum, having office at Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, Town and District Chaibasa.
6. District Agriculture Officer, Dumka, having office at P.O., P.S. & District Dumka.
7. District Agricultural Officer, Palamu, having office at P.O., P.S. & District Palamu. … … Respondents ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shivani Bhardwaj, Advocate
Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Karamjit S. Chhabra, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Shivam Kumar, AC to AG ------
11/ 18.08.2026
By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) For a direction commanding upon the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.7,56,27,579.00 to the petitioner, as the petitioner has supplied the materials pursuant to Notice Inviting
2026:JHHC:24893 2
Tender contained in P.R. No.160979 (Agriculture) 2017-18 (D) dated 20.04.2017 (Annexure-1), P.R. No.188213 (Agriculture) 2018-19 (D) dated 12.7.2018 (Annexure-1/1) and P.R. No.208466 Agriculture (2019-20) D dated 11.06.2019 (Annexure-1/2) issued on 20.4.2017, 12.7.2018 and 11.06.2019 respectively, which was earlier not paid for want of allotment of fund, but later on, despite allotment of fund, by Letter No.04/Kri.Ke.Yo.- 07/2018-53 dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure-15) and Letter No.04/Kri.Ke.Yo.-07/2018 54 dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure-16), the same was allowed to lapse on 31.03.2021. (ii) To also direct the respondents to pay the interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the admissible dues which was payable to the petitioner with effect the date the same was payable till the date of its actual payment. (iii) Cost of litigation."
2.
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and
learned counsel representing the respondents.
3.
The petitioner - Firm is claiming admitted contractual dues to the tune of Rs.7,56,27,579/-.
4.
In para-16 of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent - State, it has been stated that the Work Orders were issued in favour of the petitioner - Firm, under the Targeting Rice Fallow Area (TRFA), for supply in the Districts of Ranchi, Palamu, Dumka and Chaibasa, cost of which is amounting to Rs.6,94,80,654/-.
4.1. Further, in para-17, it has been mentioned that a total sum of Rs.5,64,43,310/-, has already been paid to the petitioner -
2026:JHHC:24893 3
Firm by the District Agriculture Officer of Ranchi and Palamu. Receipt of this amount is also not disputed by the petitioner - Firm.
4.2. So far as payment of the amount of Rs.1,30,37,344/-, is concerned, in para-19 of the counter affidavit, the respondent - State has stated that the petitioner - Firm is required to submit the requisite documents justifying its claim before the concerned District Agriculture Officer, and only thereupon the payment can be made by the Authorities.
5.
Considering the aforesaid averments made in para-19 of the counter affidavit, I direct the petitioner - Firm to furnish all the documents of the respective Districts, justifying its claim for payment of Rs.1,30,37,344/-.
5.1. Once the said documents are furnished, the State Authorities after due authentication and verification of the same, will disburse the balance amount to the petitioner - Firm.
5.2. It is expected that the entire process should be completed within a period of twelve weeks, from the date of receipt of all the documents furnished by the petitioner - Firm.
6.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th August, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2
Uploaded on 20.08.2026