Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23041 (JHR)

RAHUL SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7786/2026 · 2026-08-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:24811] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7786 of 2026 ------ Rahul Singh, aged about 27 years, son of Bishnu Singh, resident of Near G.L. Church, Hinoo Basti, Shukla Colony, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. – Doranda, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-18-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 161 of 2026(N) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(a), 20(b)(ii)(A), 27 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons was in illegal possession of 3.82 grams of Brown Sugar which is also known as Heroin, 27.5 grams of Ganja and 13 pieces of Pentazocine Injections containing morphine and all seized contraband drugs are in small quantity and from exclusive possession of the petitioner, 1.35 grams of Brown Sugar, 12.63 grams of Ganja, 04 pieces of Pentazocine Injection and 01 piece of syringe was recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.07.2026 as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 27.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6935 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge, Ranchi in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 161 of 2026(N) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.08.2026 Saroj/