APHC010399712022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6047/2022 Between: 1.SHAIK MOHAMMAD ARIF,, S/O SHAIK MOHAMMAD YOUSUF, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O 885/C 6/1, OLD PANCHYAT PINELINE ROAD, BANGALORE 2.RUHIN TAJ,, W/O SHAIK MOHAMMAD ARIF, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O 885/C 6/1, OLD PANCHYAT PINELINE ROAD, BANGALORE 3.SHAIK MOHAMMAD KHASIF, S/O SHAIK MOHAMMAD YOUSUF, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O 44-17 A, PRAKASH NAGAR, KURNOOL ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP 2.SYED NAZEERUDDIN, S/O S.KHAJAMOHIDDIN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, FLAT NO 202, VIGNETH RESIDENCY, TELECOM NAGAR, KURNOOL ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 2 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.2061 of 2025 on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Prohibition & Excise), Kurnool. Considering that one year has elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioners have not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioners are either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if they are so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.02.2026 VTS