Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2304 (JHR)

BABU LAL MURMU v. SIKANDAR MURMU

C.M.P./119/2026 · 2026-02-19

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 119 of 2026 -------- 1. Babu Lal Murmu, aged about 58 years, Son of Late Manjhi Murmu, 2. Thakur Prasad, aged about 51 years, Son of Late Manjhi Murmu, 3. Shekhar Murmu, aged about 44 years, Son of Late Manjhi Murmu, 4. Lakhi Ram Murmu, aged about 48 years, Son of Late Manjhi Murmu, All are resident of Vill.-Malpahari, P.O.-Malpahari, P.S.-Pakur (Muffasil), Dist.-Pakur, now at Vill.-Jadupur, P.O.-Daldali, P.S.-Pakur (Muffasil), Dist.-Pakur. 5. Suniram Murmu, aged about 36 years, Son of Som Murmu, Resident of Vill.-Jadupur, P.O.-Daldali, P.S. Pakur (M), Jadupur, Dist. Pakur .. ... Petitioners Versus 1. Sikandar Murmu, Son of Shiblal Tudu, R/o-Vill-Jadupur, P.O. Jadupur, P.S.-Pakur (Muffasil), Dist.-Pakur 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur, P.O. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.-Pakur … … Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Petitioners : Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : -------- Order No. 02/ Dated: 19th February, 2026 I.A. No. 15884 of 2025 1. Heard Md. Asadul Haque, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This application has been preferred by the petitioners for condoning the delay of 611 days in filing the instant Civil Misc. Petition. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant petition, the same is allowed and the delay of 611 days in filing the instant petition is hereby condoned. 4. I.A. No. 15884 of 2025 stands disposed of. C.M.P. No. 119 of 2026 5. This C.M.P. has been preferred for restoration of S.A. No. 115 of 2022 which was dismissed due to peremptory order passed for non-removal of the defect No. 1 which is pertaining to filing of typed copy of the impugned judgements. 6. Now, the aforesaid defect has been removed and in the ends of justice, the present petition is fit to be allowed. 7. There is no requirement of issuing notice to the opp. parties on the above point. 2026:JHHC:5111 2 CMP No. 119 of 2026 8. Therefore, the present C.M.P. No. 119 of 2026 is allowed and S.A. No. 115 of 2022 is restored to its original file. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 19.02.2026 Basant Uploaded on 20/02/2026