Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23038 (AP)

BODAPUDI VEERABHADRA RAO v. B V V HANUMANTHARA

CRP/3085/2018 · 2026-03-04

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010397192018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3085/2018 Between: 1. BODAPUDI VEERABHADRA RAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABUT 57 YEARS, R/O.YERRAMALLA, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. B V V HANUMANTHARA, S/O.APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. YERRAMALLA, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT. 2. BODAPURI SITARATNAM DIED, WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT 3. VEDULLA STYAVATHI, W/O.SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, SINGARAJUPALEM VILLAGE, NALLAJERLA MANDAL. 4. SANKURATRI VEERA VENKATA MAHANA RAGHAVA DEVI, W/O.SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, TANUKU. 5. NEKKALAPUDI NAGAMANI, W/O. SURYAVARAYANA, R/O.YERRAMALLA, UNGUTUR MANDAL, 6. NADIMPALLI RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, S/O. SUBBARAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. TENALI, TANUKU. 7. BODAPURI DHARMODHARA RAO, S/O. V.V.HANUMANTHARAO, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O. YERRAMALLA, UNGURU MANDAL, 8. BODAPURI / DASARI SRIDEVI, W/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. GOLLAGUDEM, UNGUTUR MANDAL, 9. NEKKALAPUDI SANJEEVARAO, S/O. RAMACHANDRARAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. SINGARAJUPALEM, NALLAJERLA MANDLA. 2 (R-5 AND 6 ARE NOT NECESSARY) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records relating to Order dated 30-10-2017 in I.A.No.455 of 2017 in o.S.No. 57 of 2002 on the file of Senior Civil Judge,Tadepalligudem and set aside the same and dismiss the IA 455 of 2017 with cost through out and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the orders dated 30-10-2017 in I.A.No.455 of 2017 in O.S.No.57 of 2002 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,Tadepalligudem pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order granted earlier on 20.07.2018 in CRP No.3085 of 2018 pending disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M P CHANDRAMOULI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANIL KUMAR KUMMARAGUNTA 2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI The court made the following ORDER:- The instant civil revision petition has been filed by the revision petitioner/respondent No.1, challenging the order dated 30.10.2017 passed in I.A.No.455 of 2017 in O.S.No.57 of 2002 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. 2. When the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3 3. On the other side, Sri P. Rishyandra Sai, learned counsel representing Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for respondent No.1, submits that the main suit in O.S.No.57 of 2022 itself was decreed partly on 29.12.2025. 4. In view of the above submission made, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the instant revision petition. 5. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 05.03.2026 GVK 4 88 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3085 of 2018 Date: 05.03.2026 GVK