M/s. Indus Towers Limited v. Guntur Municipal Corporation
WP/25838/2009 · 2026-02-22
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23036 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23036 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010403412009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25838/2009 Between:
1. M/S. INDUS TOWERS LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, USHA 36, JUBILEE TOWERS ROAD NO. 36, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS CIRCLE HEAD
2. M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED, SPLENDID TOWERS, OPP. BEGUMPET POLICE STATION HUDA ROAD, BEGUMPET, REP. BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER LEGAL
3. M/S. VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LIMITED, 6TH FLOOR, VARUN TOWERS II, BEGUMPET , HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANGER (FINANCE)
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Rep. by its Commissioner Guntur, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the notice C.C.T. no. 3/09 dt. 9-11- 09 insisting upon the petitioner companies to comply with the conditions as mentioned in the G.O.Ms.No. 183 as arbitrary illegal, and in violation of the well settled principles of natural justice and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 33652 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent corporation not to demolish or remove the towers erected in the jurisdiction of the Guntur Municipal Corporation by suspending the operation of the notice in C.C.T. No. 3/09 dt. 9-11-2009 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO
2. K MANIDEEPIKA (SC FOR VGTMUDA)
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Sri S. Raja Mouli, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Ghanta Rama Rao, Ld. Senior Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the Letter dated 16.02.2026 submitted in the Registry seeking withdrawal of this Writ Petition. This Letter dated 16.02.2026 is taken on record. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.02.2026 Mnr
112
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.25838 OF 2009
Dt.23.02.2026 Mnr