Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23029 (JHR)

RANCHI TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, NAMELY AJAY SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6392/2026 · 2026-08-21

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25298 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6392 of 2026 ------ Ranchi Technosolutions Pvt. Ltd., office at Shop No.401A, Satya Ganga Arcade, Lalji Hirji Road, PO, GPO Ranchi, PS-Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand, through its director, namely Ajay Singh, S/o Tej Narain Singh, R/o House No.24, Datta Villa Road, Beside Dwarika Apartment, Morabadi, PO & PS-Kanke, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC), Jharkhand, office at 3rd floor, Nepal House, Doranda, PO & PS- Doranda, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Sido-Kanhu Murmu University, through its Registrar, Office at Dighi Campus, Dumka-Pakur Road Dumka, PO & PS-Dudhani, Dist-Dumka, Jharkhand. 4. Vice-Chancellor, Sido-Kanhu Murmu University, Office at Dighi Campus, Dumka-Pakur Road Dumka, PO & PS-Dudhani, Dist- Dumka, Jharkhand. 5. Registrar, Sido-Kanhu Murmu University, Office at Dighi Campus, Dumka-Pakur Road Dumka, PO & PS-Dudhani, Dist- Dumka, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhneet Jha, Advocate Mr. Shubham Gautam, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : AC to AG Mr. Mithilesh Singh, GA-IV ------ 02/ 21st August, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for the following reliefs: - “(A) For issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding the respondent-MSEFC to forthwith list, hear, and expeditiously adjudicate the pending case being JHMSEFC-36/2021 (New Case No.JH/20/M/JKH/00291) under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act, 2006, within a time-bound period, in strict compliance with the statutory mandate of Section 18(5) of the Act which prescribes a 90-days period for disposal. (B) For issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding the respondent-University to forthwith release the outstanding principal sum of Rs.1,59,94,379.88/- along with statutory compound interest with monthly rests as mandated under Section 2026:JHHC:25298 Page | 2 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006, arising out of the successful completion of works as per Work Orders Nos.SKMU/R- G/574/2015 and SKMU/R-G/469/2026.” 3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the petitioner is a Micro Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME) and is governed by the Micro Small, and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act of 2006. He submits that since there are dues, they had approached the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) but the MSEFC is sitting over the matter. He submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given to the MSEFC to dispose of the application of the petitioner, as per the provision of MSMED Act, 2006, as early as possible. 4. Considering the aforesaid fact, I direct the MSEFC to dispose of the application of the petitioner preferably within a period of three months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, since the matter is pending from 2023. 5. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 21st August, 2026 S.K.D/CP-2 Uploaded on 22 /08/2026