Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23019 (CHH)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2988/2026 · 2026-06-21

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25303 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2988 of 2026 1 - Raj Kumar S/o Bhojram, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Kabaripali, Tahsil- Dabhra, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Managment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G) 2 - Collector, Sakti, District Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhara, District Sakti (C.G) 4 - Tahsildar- Dabhra, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22.06.2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:- VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 “10.1 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for correction of registration of paddy sale entries after verification. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities for deciding the representation of the petitioner. 10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s land has been submerged in the Ghatoi Dam, as such, the amount which has been deposited in his account as bonus for cultivating paddy is not in accordance with law; it has been granted to the petitioner due to non-correction of revenue records by the concerned Tahsildar, as such, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking relief that the concerned Tahsildar may be directed to correct the revenue records deleting name of petitioner in revenue records, while correcting the entries of petitioner’s name in respect of land bearing khasra No. 910/6 (admeasuring area 0.081 hectares) situated at Village Kekrabhath, Tehsil Dabhra, District - Sakti, as the petitioner has never sold any paddy. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that if any application of petitioner is pending, same will be considered and decided as per law, expeditiously. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the records enclosed along with the writ petition. 3 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of directing the concerned Tahsildar to correct the revenue records while deleting name of petitioner in respect of land bearing khasra No. 910/6 (admeasuring area 0.081 hectares) situated at Village Kekrabhath, Tehsil Dabhra, District - Sakti. 6. The petitioner is directed to refund the amount received by him towards bonus in respect of the aforesaid land, in the event such amount has been credited to his account. 7. CC as per rules. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha